the validate script is producing names that don't comply with standards..
On Dec 18, 2014, at 10:36 AM, Brett Gladman gladman@astro.ubc.ca wrote:
Hi there,
Let me just remind the victorians that designations
cannot be a pure number...it causes problems for the
Bern code. In the last .inp file JJ gave me there were
things like '134' which caused problems. Also, I
don't like how non-unique that may be for searches
in the database.
I dealt with this (like I did with other things) by
just grafting a string on the front, so you can keep
doing this but your names over there won't match ours
over here.
No biggie,
Brett
the validate script is producing names that don't comply with standards..
On Dec 18, 2014, at 10:36 AM, Brett Gladman gladman@astro.ubc.ca wrote:
Hi there,
Let me just remind the victorians that designations
cannot be a pure number...it causes problems for the
Bern code. In the last .inp file JJ gave me there were
things like '134' which caused problems. Also, I
don't like how non-unique that may be for searches
in the database.
I dealt with this (like I did with other things) by
just grafting a string on the front, so you can keep
doing this but your names over there won't match ours
over here.
No biggie,
Brett