Skip to content

tip worth mentioning getters / setters #6

Description

@robin-raymond

https://github.com/jchadwick/EssentialTypeScriptBook/blob/master/manuscript/05.Classes.md

At this point I want to point out that, even though I've been calling them "getter and setter properties" like they have to go together, this code is actually perfectly legitimate -- you don't need to define a getter AND a setter for a property - you can implement either one or both of them, depending on what you're trying to accomplish.

I believe getters and setters in C# do not allow a setter exclusively without first defining a getter. I think that is worth mentioning here as a note that it is allowed in TS (assuming it is...);

Also when I was searching the legality I read some stuff about odd property inheritance not being o

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions