Invalid and questioned Strongs numbers in the derivation field

[Nainoia-Inc-Admin]

I am using these files to generate a Strong's lexicon.

/greek/strongs-greek-dictionary.js
/hebrew/strongs-hebrew-dictionary.js

I see that the derivation field references other Strong's numbers related to the lexicon entry. So I also did a look up for the referenced Strong's numbers to insure they were valid and pointing to an existing Strong's number. So I discovered a handful of invalid reference.

Entry G137 derivation references G5869 which does not exist
Entry G25 derivation references G5689 which does not exist
Entry G3304 derivation references G3203 which does not exist
Entry G3305 derivation references G3203 which does not exist
Entry G3642 derivation references G6590 which is not an original Strong's number, but is an extended number. Is that okay?
Entry G4460 derivation references G7343 which is not an original Strong's number, but is an extended number. Is that okay?

Thanks for an help solving this problem.

[raysolva]

I found out that in strings-dictionary.xhtml entry G137 actually references H5869, not G5869.

So this:

<li value="137" id="nt:137"><i title="{ahee-nohn'}" xml:lang="grc">Αἰνών</i> of Hebrew origin (a derivative of <a href="#ot:5869"><i title="{ah'-yin}" xml:lang="hbo">עַ֫יִן</i></a>, place of springs); &#xC6;non, a place in Palestine: <span class="kjv_def">&#xC6;non</span>.</li>

Refers to this:

<li value="5869" id="ot:5869"><i title="{ah'-yin}" xml:lang="hbo">עַ֫יִן</i> probably a primitive word; an eye (literally or figuratively); by analogy, a fountain (as the eye of the landscape): <span class="kjv_def">affliction, outward appearance, + before, + think best, colour, conceit, + be content, countenance, + displease, eye((-brow), (-d), -sight), face, + favour, fountain, furrow (from the margin), X him, + humble, knowledge, look, (+ well), X me, open(-ly), + (not) please, presence, + regard, resemblance, sight, X thee, X them, + think, X us, well, X you(-rselves)</span>.</li>

Therefore I suppose that G5869 that is in the file strongs-greek-dictionary.js - is a typo, and assume that is the same case for the rest of entries you've pointed out here.

Without readme it's hard to tell surely, but, by my superficial guess, it seems that .xhtml is the most reliable one to work with.