test: added a new unit tests to validate the cases like '"": "gts://gtx.x.test6.invalid_uri_body.bad_prefix.v1~"'

[Artifizer]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Added coverage confirming that schemas using a gts:// identifier are rejected when their body has an invalid prefix.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Team

Run ID: efb08e2b-2601-4a75-b2f8-da274d338573

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 97af7a7 and b8e4c98.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• gts/src/ops.rs

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds a test that verifies add_entity rejects a schema with a gts:// identifier whose body starts with gtx..

Changes

GTS validation

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Invalid URI body validation gts/src/ops.rs	Adds coverage for an invalid gts:// schema identifier and checks for the "Unable to detect GTS ID" error.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to b8e4c

This adds coverage ensuring schemas with an invalid gts:// identifier body are rejected. It does not change runtime behavior, and no merge-blocking risk remains.

Suggested reviewers: aviator5

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title refers to the added test, but it is grammatically unclear and focuses on a malformed example instead of stating that the test validates rejection of an invalid GTS URI body prefix.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 2 functions across 1 files.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch new-tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[code-ranker-app]

code-ranker: 4 findings View report ↗

rust: 4 findings

• gts-macros/src/instance.rs:35 — mutual cycle between gts-macros/src/lib.rs ↔ gts-macros/src/instance.rs
• gts/src/schema_resolver.rs:15 — mutual cycle between gts/src/store.rs ↔ gts/src/schema_resolver.rs
• gts-id/src/gts_id.rs:11 — mutual cycle between gts-id/src/gts_id.rs ↔ gts-id/src/gts_id_pattern.rs
• gts-id/src/gts_id_segment.rs:19 — mutual cycle between gts-id/src/gts_id_segment.rs ↔ gts-id/src/parse.rs

🤖 Prompt for fix all with AI

Run `code-ranker check --top 1` and follow instructions to fix error. Loop until no errors left.

_{updated 2026-09-06 10:06 UTC}