RFCs: Event-driven noise and leakage-aware channels - #591
Draft
qciaran wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
qciaran
force-pushed
the
transition-channel-rfc
branch
2 times, most recently
from
August 25, 2026 08:58
e4ec851 to
8dfc2f0
Compare
qciaran
force-pushed
the
transition-channel-rfc
branch
from
August 25, 2026 09:13
8dfc2f0 to
95eef83
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This specification-only PR now contains two linked RFCs:
The split allows reviewers to assess the channel mathematics independently from the broader runtime migration while retaining one coherent design.
Event-driven noise RFC
TriggerIdvalues from process-local compiled IDsGeneralNoiseModelcompatibility facade with no independent sampling logicCustomtrigger transportLeakage-aware channel RFC
*an identity wire that never resolves or collapses the untouched qubit*LandL*rules with documented shared-coin semanticsContext and conformance
Draft PR #518 remains an exploratory transition-channel implementation prototype. The experimental
pecos-neocomposable noise system provides event-driven implementation experience. Neither is treated as a compatibility baseline.PR #545 supplies the device-neutral Selene conformance foundation. A legacy plugin and an event-driven plugin should share immutable parameters and runtime translation, then be compared using:
Review focus
The RFCs end with separate decision checklists. Remaining open questions include:
leakage_scale/leak2depolarnamingValidation
uv run --frozen pre-commit run --all-filesgit diff --checkGeneralNoiseModel, experimentalpecos-neoevents, and PR feat(selene): add PECOS general noise error-model plugin #545's conformance design