Add source-grounded evidence map skill 🤖🤖🤖 - #2505
Open
alsoleg89 wants to merge 3 commits into
Open
Conversation
Contributor
|
🟡 Contributor Reputation Check: MEDIUM risk
Maintainers: please review this contributor before merging. |
Contributor
🔒 PR Risk Scan ResultsScanned 5 changed file(s).
|
Contributor
🔍 Vally Lint Results✅ All checks passed
Summary
Full linter output |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
build-evidence-mapAgent Skill for contested technical choices, research synthesis, and consequential decisionsWhy
Research output often collapses disagreement into polished prose. This skill keeps the provisional position, counterevidence, scope qualifications, and decision-changing unknowns inspectable in a portable
.doubt.jsonartifact.The bundled validator is intentionally fail-closed. A file hash, node count, JSON parse, or manual schema review cannot be reported as successful validation. This closes a failure observed in a controlled Codex portability run where a network-blocked package command failed but the agent still claimed success. The before/after artifacts and sanitized sessions are public in alsoleg89/doubt.
Validation
npm run skill:validate— all 396 skill folders validnpm run build— catalog entry includes both references and bundled scriptsVALID 621b1c85104757e4b3752764710d07fb9d6f721c26eaa3e74ee9b1563d82ad89doubt-ai@0.8.0contractgit diff --checkSource retrieval remains explicit: the skill never performs network verification without permission, and it does not describe structural validity as proof that a source or conclusion is true.