Skip to content

docs(okf): public vs ephemeral vs private; Efficiency check - #9213

Open
mikehardy wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
feature/cprn-364-okf-policy-linear-is-ephemeral-efficiency-check
Open

docs(okf): public vs ephemeral vs private; Efficiency check#9213
mikehardy wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
feature/cprn-364-okf-policy-linear-is-ephemeral-efficiency-check

Conversation

@mikehardy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • Treat Linear as ephemeral in OKF: durable facts stay GitHub-public only (okf-bundle/).
  • Add an Efficiency check to the OKF consistency pass (concise, link instead of restating).
  • Point Canonical at okf-bundle/testing/index.md; keep committed work queues under okf-bundle/ as ephemeral.

Fixes CPRN-364

Test plan

  • Read okf-bundle/documentation-policy.md and confirm durable vs ephemeral split (Linear IDs/gates not in general OKF).
  • Confirm Canonical links from that file resolve to okf-bundle/testing/index.md.
  • Confirm okf-bundle/index.md blurb still points at the policy without restating it.

@mikehardy
mikehardy force-pushed the feature/cprn-364-okf-policy-linear-is-ephemeral-efficiency-check branch 2 times, most recently from f703129 to 71891c7 Compare August 22, 2026 16:30
@mikehardy mikehardy changed the title docs(okf): treat Linear as ephemeral; add Efficiency OKF check docs(okf): public vs ephemeral vs private; Efficiency check Aug 22, 2026
GitHub-public reference docs exclude ephemeral work-queue fields and
private tracker items. Efficiency is information-preserving brevity:
completeness wins over token count.
@mikehardy
mikehardy force-pushed the feature/cprn-364-okf-policy-linear-is-ephemeral-efficiency-check branch from 34f3a4f to 78b46d9 Compare August 22, 2026 17:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant