CNTRLPLANE-1544: bindata: Use restricted-v3 scc for deployments - #1066
CNTRLPLANE-1544: bindata: Use restricted-v3 scc for deployments#1066tchap wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
|
@tchap: This pull request references CNTRLPLANE-1544 which is a valid jira issue. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
This effectively enforces user namespaces.
76c4c6e to
f72a656
Compare
|
/retest |
1 similar comment
|
/retest |
|
@tchap: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jhadvig, tchap The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle stale |
|
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited) Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
🔗 Linked repositories identifiedCodeRabbit considers these linked repositories for cross-repo context during reviews:
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 12 included reviews per hour; 11 remain after this review. 📜 Recent review details🧰 Additional context used📓 Path-based instructions (11)bindata/assets/**/*.yaml📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (ARCHITECTURE.md)
Files:
**/*.{yaml,yml,json}📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (Custom checks)
Files:
{manifests,bindata/assets,quickstarts,examples,profile-patches}/**/*.{yaml,yml}📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.claude/skills/manifest-review.md)
Files:
**/*.yaml⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file
Files:
**/*.{yaml,yml}⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file
Files:
**/*.go📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)
Files:
⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file
Files:
**/*_test.go📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)
Files:
⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file
Files:
{pkg,cmd}/**/*.go📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
Files:
pkg/console/subresource/**/*.go📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (ARCHITECTURE.md)
Files:
pkg/**/*_test.go📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.claude/skills/unit-test-review.md)
Files:
**/*.{py,js,ts,go,rs,java,rb,php,kt,swift,cs}⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file
Files:
🔇 Additional comments (3)
WalkthroughThe console and downloads deployments now require the ChangesPod security context
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Merge Risk: 🔵 Low · up to The deployment manifests now enforce restricted-v3 and disable host users; before merging, the generated deployment output should be verified to contain both changes for console and downloads deployments. This is a bounded follow-up risk and is otherwise mergeable with owner awareness. Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 14 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (14 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
|
@tchap: This pull request references CNTRLPLANE-1544 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the epic to target either version "5.1.0." or "openshift-5.1.0.", but it targets "openshift-4.22" instead. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/hold /payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-console-operator-main-e2e-hypershift-conformance |
|
@jhadvig: trigger 0 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command |
This effectively enforces user namespaces.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Security
Tests