Skip to content

[SPIKE] Include a multi-project view in the timeline widget for projects with children - #24528

Draft
HDinger wants to merge 1 commit into
devfrom
feature/sppm-317-include-a-multi-project-view-in-the-timeline-widget-for-projects-with-children
Draft

[SPIKE] Include a multi-project view in the timeline widget for projects with children#24528
HDinger wants to merge 1 commit into
devfrom
feature/sppm-317-include-a-multi-project-view-in-the-timeline-widget-for-projects-with-children

Conversation

@HDinger

@HDinger HDinger commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

⚠️ This is a vibe coded proof of concept on how to show hierarchal views in the timeline widget. It only includes the happy path but no checks permissions or tests. The only reason to push it already was to get a pullpreview. Do not merge ⚠️

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploying openproject with PullPreview

Field Value
Latest commit 4177c22
Job deploy
Status ✅ Deploy successful
Preview URL https://pr-24528-sppm-317-include-ip-157-90-246-145.my.opf.run:443

View logs

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Flaky specs

  • rspec ./modules/bim/spec/features/ifc_models/direct_ifc_upload_spec.rb[1:1:1:1:1]
  • rspec ./modules/bim/spec/features/ifc_models/direct_ifc_upload_spec.rb[1:1:2:1:1]
🤖 Ask Copilot to investigate

Copy the prompt below into a new comment on this PR to delegate the investigation to GitHub Copilot. It will look into the flakiness and open a separate pull request with you as reviewer.

@copilot The following spec(s) are flaky in CI (first seen on PR #24528, linked for reference only):

- `rspec ./modules/bim/spec/features/ifc_models/direct_ifc_upload_spec.rb[1:1:1:1:1]`
- `rspec ./modules/bim/spec/features/ifc_models/direct_ifc_upload_spec.rb[1:1:2:1:1]`

Treat this as a standalone task, unrelated to PR #24528. Create a new branch from origin/dev and open a new pull request targeting dev — do not stack it on PR #24528 or reuse that branch.

Follow the playbook in docs/development/testing/handling-flaky-tests/README.md to find the root cause and fix the underlying race — do not skip, delete, or weaken the spec to make it pass; disabling is a last resort per the playbook, and only with a bug ticket. Verify the fix by running the spec(s) repeatedly (e.g. `script/bulk_run_rspec --run-count 10`).

If you cannot reproduce the flake or are not confident in a fix after reasonable investigation, do not fabricate a change or skip the spec to force CI green. Instead, leave the pull request in draft and document what you tried, the suspected cause, and any leads in its description, then assign @HDinger to take over.

Once the fix is verified, title the PR after the spec(s) it fixes, and use the PR description to explain the root cause, how the change resolves it, and the before/after results. Label the PR `flaky-spec`, assign @HDinger, and request a review from @HDinger.
On every commit, set @HDinger as the sole co-author with a `Co-authored-by:` trailer (use their GitHub no-reply email so it links to their account), so it is traceable who dispatched the fix.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant