Skip to content

feat(release): add beta publishing channel - #53

Merged
rkdud007 merged 7 commits into
mainfrom
pia/publish-beta-workflow
Sep 3, 2026
Merged

feat(release): add beta publishing channel#53
rkdud007 merged 7 commits into
mainfrom
pia/publish-beta-workflow

Conversation

@rkdud007

@rkdud007 rkdud007 commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

so we can now trigger publish.yaml as workflow through github ci, and if only our branch contains MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH-beta.NUMBER these format of .version file, the workflow will deploy

smth like this e.g 1.17.0-beta.1

TypeScript/Go: 1.17.0-beta.1
Python: 1.17.0b1

Select a branch with a synced X.Y.Z-beta.N version and run the
manual beta workflow to publish npm, PyPI, and Go prereleases without
changing the public docs.

Reuse the stable publishing jobs, tag npm releases as beta, and map
Python package versions to PEP 440 while keeping stable releases on
main.
Run manual beta releases through the npm-trusted publish workflow on main and reject any source without synchronized prerelease versions. Build source-controlled packages without credentials, then verify and publish only their artifacts in narrowly scoped jobs.
Tag a synchronized beta commit as vX.Y.Z-beta.N and push it to
publish prerelease packages. Stable releases continue to publish from
main.

Replace the manually selected source branch and artifact handoff with
an immutable tag trigger that validates the tag against .version.
@rkdud007
rkdud007 requested a review from necolas September 3, 2026 21:59
@rkdud007

rkdud007 commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-03T22:03:00.921941Z 7c8369e Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 7c8369eb17

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread .github/workflows/publish.yml Outdated
Select a branch containing synchronized beta versions and run the
Publish SDKs workflow to release it across npm, PyPI, and Go.

Use the dispatch event as the beta channel signal and retain the
existing main-branch push as the stable release path.
Make the empty manual trigger explicit and remove beta operations from
AGENTS.md. The workflow validates its release channel at runtime.
Keep the channel check read-only without storing a version that the
manual branch workflow no longer needs for tag matching.
Preserve the existing manual-trigger formatting and package-version
agent guidance so the pull request stays focused on release behavior.
@rkdud007
rkdud007 merged commit 738da5c into main Sep 3, 2026
3 checks passed
@rkdud007
rkdud007 deleted the pia/publish-beta-workflow branch September 3, 2026 22:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants