Conversation
mpadge
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a great enhancement. Thank you!
|
I'll now wait for feedback after asking about this in Slack. |
Co-authored-by: Joel Nitta <joelnitta@gmail.com>
| - Mientras se revisa tu paquete, por favor, no hagas ningún cambio, salvo las correcciones urgentes. De hecho, los revisores deben poder revisar la última versión (la mejor hasta ahora) de tu software, y esa versión no debería cambiar. | ||
| - Te pedimos que respondas a estos comentarios en un plazo máximo de 2 semanas desde la última revisión presentada, pero puedes actualizar tu paquete o responder en cualquier momento. Tu respuesta debe incluir un enlace a la actualización del archivo [*NEWS.md*](#news) de tu paquete. Aquí tienes [un ejemplo de respuesta](https://github.com/ropensci/software-review/issues/593#issuecomment-1714421144). Una vez hayas respondido, [enviala a nuestra base de datos usando nuestro bot](#submit-response-to-reviewers). Animamos a la continuación de conversaciones entre autores y revisores. Consulta la [guía de revisión](#reviewerguide) para más detalles. | ||
| - Te pedimos que respondas a estos comentarios en un plazo máximo de 2 semanas desde la última revisión presentada, pero puedes actualizar tu paquete o responder en cualquier momento. Tu respuesta debe incluir un enlace a la actualización del archivo [*NEWS.md*](#news) de tu paquete. Aquí tienes [un ejemplo de respuesta](https://github.com/ropensci/software-review/issues/593#issuecomment-1714421144). Una vez hayas respondido, [enviala a nuestra base de datos usando nuestro bot](#submit-response-to-reviewers). Si las personas que revisaron tu paquete [usaron prefijos](#prefixing) antes de sus comentarios, por ejemplo, ml01, ml02, úsalos también en tu respuesta. | ||
| - Animamos a la continuación de conversaciones entre autores y revisores. Consulta la [guía de revisión](#reviewerguide) para más detalles. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| - Animamos a la continuación de conversaciones entre autores y revisores. Consulta la [guía de revisión](#reviewerguide) para más detalles. | |
| - Animamos a continuar las conversaciones entre las personas autoras y revisoras. Consulta la [guía de revisión](#reviewerguide) para más detalles. |
| - While your package is under review, please refrain from making any change, apart from hot fixes. Indeed, reviewers should be able to review the latest (best until now) version of your software, and that version should not be changing. | ||
| - We ask that you respond to reviewers' comments within 2 weeks of the last-submitted review, but you may make updates to your package or respond at any time. Your response should include a link to the updated [NEWS.md](#news) of your package. Here is [an author response example](https://github.com/ropensci/software-review/issues/160#issuecomment-355043656). Once the response is commited, [submit it using the bot](#submit-response-to-reviewers). We encourage ongoing conversations between authors and reviewers. See the [reviewing guide](#reviewerguide) for more details. | ||
| - We ask that you respond to reviewers' comments within 2 weeks of the last-submitted review, but you may make updates to your package or respond at any time. Your response should include a link to the updated [NEWS.md](#news) of your package. Here is [an author response example](https://github.com/ropensci/software-review/issues/160#issuecomment-355043656). Once the response is commited, [submit it using the bot](#submit-response-to-reviewers). If reviewers [used prefixes](#prefixing) before their comments e.g. ml01, ml02, use them in your response as well. | ||
| - We encourage ongoing conversations between authors and reviewers. See the [reviewing guide](#reviewerguide) for more details. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you clarify what this means?
The automatic translation is bad, and I don't know if this means that we encourage people to continue chatting after the review...or what do we try to mean here...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That they can talk in the issue outside of the review and the response if needed. How can I make this clearer?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hehe, many times I don't like my own writing after a while... 😸 😅
So, this mean that people can talk about the review in other places, like Slack?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
no, that they can write comments in the issue to have a conversation, that they don't need to communicate only through the review + the author response + the reviewers response
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Something like this?
We encourage authors and reviewers to keep the conversation going in the issue comments when needed. You don't have to limit the discussion to the formal review and the responses cycle. See the reviewing guide for more details.
Animamos a las personas autoras y revisoras a que usen los comentarios del issue para mantener el diálogo cuando sea necesario. No es necesario limitar el debate al ciclo formal de revisión y respuestas. Consulta la guía de revisión para obtener más detalles.
yabellini
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I need clarification on the English version to be able to edit the spanish one.
|
Thank you @yabellini! (For the record, that sentence was already in the guide before the edit, but I'm putting it in its own item to make space for the thing I am adding 😅 I am however happy for us to improve that text, excellent opportunity to clarify it) |
Fix #1024
Checklist for dev guide maintainers, do not delete 😸